Al Qaeda Does Not Exist
That is not a mistake in the title of this post. The terrorist organization that is ubiquitous in the so-called American “news” media does not even exist. The name “Al Qaeda” is a CIA propaganda creation.
In fact, the CIA has been trying to create Al Qaeda since the early 1990’s, and according to Jane Mayer of the New Yorker magazine, began the kidnapping and torture program known as “rendition” in 1995, at the start of Bill Clinton’s second term of office.
When I say “create” Al Qaeda, what do I mean? Exactly what it sounds like. No such entity exists now, nor has it ever. This is and has been a big problem for the CIA and their big brother the Pentagon ever since the Soviet Union went bankrupt and gave up the empire game. When this happened the cold war apparatus that composes the American Empire had no reason to exist. That is very dangerous for an entity which consumes more than one out of every three tax dollars collected from the American taxpayer.
After all, this is no socialist utopia. While Canadian and European cities are clean both of dirt and mentally troubled citizens, American cities look like post apocalyptic nightmares, with American citizens in various states of decay strewn about the sidewalks like a third world Latin American banana republic. Some people have even taken to referring to America as a banana republic with nuclear weapons. I mean other than weapons of mass destruction (we’re the number one producer!) and fast food, what does America produce? Oh I forgot, we’re also number one in the production of pornography. We might be number one in strip clubs too, but I have not researched that yet.
So what were the options for keeping the military empire going? 1) they could tell the American people straight up that they who make all the decisions in secret without our input intentionally -and for great personal profit- dismembered our manufacturing base in the 1980’s and early 1990’s, sending all of it to the third world, mostly to China. Having done that, they -the people at the top of American society who get all the money while their mouth pieces in the “news” media tell us we need to be more “productive” (less money, more hours worked)- could say that the only viable plan as they see it is to rule the world through force. Invade countries that have something we want to both get that something and to show other nations that we are ruthless and will not stop at any border. Negotiate trade agreements with us to our liking, lend money to us at our terms, or we will attack you.
Or, 2) they could deceive us.
The really troubling thing about it is that the deception was not even well done. In fact it was more like a declaration of war against the American people, putting us in the same boat as the rest of the world’s people. True, they have killed far more Iraqis and Afghans than Americans, but before they did so they killed almost three thousand Americans on September 11, 2001.
Oh I don’t care how you arrived at this site, or with what expectations. You know who masterminded the attacks of 9-11, and you know it was not some towel head named Osama bin Laden sitting in a cave in Pakistan or Afghanistan while hooked up to a kidney dialysis machine (if you have never seen a dialysis machine in action go over to a hospital near you and ask, and be prepared to feel outraged at the ridiculous lie you have been fed).
You knew the afternoon of 9-11 when Building Seven (WTC-7) came straight down just like a building wired with demolitions charges, even though it was never hit by anything other than the same dust particles that people who are alive today sucked into their lungs. Jack Ruby in the garage shooting Oswald was not as obvious.
Then their was the anthrax sent to the TV network news rooms, just in case someone in charge was not sufficiently on-board with the program (real overkill in my opinion, but it has worked). And whatever happened to that murder/terror case? All we really know is that the anthrax spores came from the U.S. Armies laboratories in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Officially the investigation -such as it was- has been closed. And done so without any noise from the “news” media in this country who were the targets of the attacks. No noise from congress either, even though the Senate leader Tom Daschle also received an anthrax package.
Perhaps members of congress remember when Senator John Tower of Texas wrote a book and started on tour to get even with those who blocked his nomination to Defense Secretary under the first President Bush. Boom! went his plane.
Perhaps members of congress remember when Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota went to Colombia and pronounced himself opposed to “Plan Columbia”, and then soon after his plane too went “boom!”.
Wellstone was a Democrat, Tower a Republican. This is called “bipartisanship”, something those in the big-time “news” media work hard to enforce on members of congress. Shortly after 9-11 they received some bipartisan anthrax in the mail.
I remember that it was not very long after 9-11 and the anthrax deliveries that I watched ABC “World News Tonight with Peter Jennings”, and there was a guy sitting right next to Peter Jennings, and it was not Brian Ross, no Peter introduced him as “former CIA agent Robert Baer”. Not a very good description actually. Disturbing enough that a CIA agent was sitting next to Peter Jennings, and still more disturbing that this caused no outcry anywhere. But Robert Baer was a “covert operations” officer. Those are the agents who kill people.
Again, if this was to impress the “news” media that the CIA was in control, and they had better tow the line, then it was overkill. No one in the media asked any questions about Building Seven (WTC-7). In fact, the TV networks only showed one replay of Building Seven collapsing upon itself. Americans saw Jack Ruby shoot Oswald over and over again, like the two towers falling, but Building Seven they saw no more than twice, and nearly half of the American people never saw Building Seven come down.
If you still have some small doubt that the “news” media was not an accessory to this most egregious act of treason then consider this. Why did the news media not rush to the US-Mexican border with their cameras pointed at the legions of illegals streaming across the border? Why did they not point their cameras at these people and ask aloud “Are they Mexicans coming here to work, or terrorists sent by Osama bin Laden to destroy America?”
Instead the “news” media fought hard against anyone who made such an argument, biting their tongue so as not to say “It was the CIA stupid!”
In the last eight years we have been buried with articles about third world garbage dumps alleged to be “nations” and told how they were breeding grounds for terrorism, yet Mexico is as bad off as any of these places. Ruled by competing drug lords, and competing corrupt police agencies (all strongly influenced by the CIA-DEA import-export drug management team), and a grossly corrupt political establishment trained at Harvard University -and who live a first world luxurious lifestyle on their haciendas- Mexico is the perfect base for an organization such as Al Qaeda. If Osama bin Laden existed as we are told, he could buy whole states inside Mexico to train terrorists and build weapons.
Yet no one in the “news” media ever suggests such a scenario. Not once in eight years. You can find stories about how it costs just four dollars to bribe a Mexican traffic cop out of a traffic ticket, but nothing about the terrorist danger of such poverty and massive corruption so close to us.
And what of this fictional group called “Al Qaeda”, why would the CIA be so intent on creating and/or promoting such an entity? For the simple reason that we Americans are not going to learn the names of hundreds of Islamic terror cells in dozens of nations throughout the third world. This way the CIA can drop a bombing attack into the TV “news” that occurred in some third world crap-hole, which has no bearing on American lives whatsoever, and make it seem as if it does.
Think about it. You turn on the news and in some country whose location you are fuzzy about it is announced by the so-called “news” anchor that a car bombing happened outside a mosque or maybe a supermarket. The TV “news” anchor announces that the attack was carried out by the “Islamic Soldiers of a Caliphate loving Indonesia”. Your reaction to that is “So? Why are you telling me?”
Ahh yes, but now you have been trained like a monkey to fear this group called “Al Qaeda”. So now the “news” anchor tells you that the attack which was in fact carried out by a group calling itself the “Islamic Soldiers of a Caliphate loving Indonesia” was instead carried out by “Al Qaeda”. You still have no idea where this place is that the bombing attack occurred. The bombing still has no effect on your life and never will, but the “news” anchor has wrung Pavlov’s bell by saying the magic words “Al Qaeda”.
Now do you see why the CIA had to create “Al Qaeda”?
And the CIA is and has been hard at work trying to create such an entity as the fictional “Al Qaeda”. If you do some reading at serious news sites rather than watching TV then you may be familiar with the CIA program of kidnapping and torture called “Rendition”. This is not the CIA’s first effort at kidnapping and torture as even so-called serious newspapers such as the New York Times and Washington Post, or magazines such as The New Yorker would have you believe. This is what Gore Vidal means when he refers to the “United States of Amnesia”.
During the eleven years that the U.S. was in Vietnam the CIA ran a kidnap and torture program called “Phoenix”. The American “news” media refuse to write or produce any video reports about the Phoenix program. There are very few references to this program in books, and none in U.S. History books, even at the college level. Most Americans -well over 90%- have never heard of the Phoenix program.
The only good history book written about this CIA operation is called “The Phoenix Program” and is authored by Douglas Valentine.
Why is it important to know about the Phoenix program? Because the CIA kidnapped, tortured, and then murdered over 30,000 Vietnamese. That is correct. Kidnapped, tortured and then murdered over thirty thousand Vietnamese.
The Rendition program by the CIA does not as a rule murder the torture victim. Is that because the CIA has become more humane?
No. Human beings do not torture people. Psychopathic humans do.
To understand the CIA’s motivations with the Rendition program as opposed to the Phoenix program you must look at the locations of the CIA “renditions”. What you see is people snatched from mostly European states, and you see that the kidnappings occur all over the European continent. It looks like a spiderweb. Then the CIA releases the torture victim back into his community, which already has many radical Islamic individuals in it. There people who are already angry at the U.S. because we back Israel with billions of dollars of financial aid and high tech weapons every year are now confronted with a friend who has been kidnapped and tortured by the CIA. There he is in the flesh recounting his tales of terror at the hands of his CIA captors. And before long he is telling his true tales to the media who then magnify what has happened to him to a European wide audience and before long an international audience. This breeds more hatred for America, courtesy of the CIA. Hatred because the CIA and military intelligence (DIA, ONI etc.) go unpunished.
Why did the CIA kill their torture victims in Vietnam? Because the enemy in Vietnam existed on a large scale and the CIA was trying to defeat that enemy and retake control of Vietnam. Releasing their torture victims would of course breed more resistance, not less.
Now the CIA is actually trying to create an organized enemy called “Al Qaeda” so they will have something to fight against, thus justifying the existence of the CIA and the Pentagon. This is not a short term deal either. Their spokesmen on TV have even told us that the “War on Terror” will last at least fifty years. Just a coincidence that the “Cold War” against the Soviet Union also lasted fifty years.
You the taxpayer quite rightly do not care about a car bombing in some third world crap-hole carried out by the “Islamic Soldiers of a Caliphate loving Indonesia”. After all, we have a double digit unemployment “rate” and the actual number of unemployed Americans is far higher. Almost one out of every three American males age 20 or over is unemployed. And those who rule this country keep bringing more immigrants here.
The CIA and Pentagon have no idea what to do to cure these conditions as far as seriously lowering the unemployment of Americans. So they instead choose to scare the hell out of us about some fictional enemy which the CIA would very much like to create and develop into a real and viable enemy.
And the “news” media sell these lies to us everyday.
For over eight years they have shoved the Osama Bin Laden did 9-11 lie down our throats, even though the FBI stated many years ago that they have no evidence that he was involved, and indeed if you go to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists section of their Web site you can read for yourself that Usama (as the FBI call him) Bin Laden is not wanted for 9-11 crimes.
The “news” media have ignored this fact, neither raising it for discussion nor criticizing the FBI. In fact the media have never called for so much as resignations from the FBI or CIA either for failing to stop 9-11 or for failing to arrest and convict those responsible.
And where is Osama Bin Laden, or his faithful sidekick, the Egyptian doctor Ayman Al-Zawahiri? I mean we have been indoctrinated to believe that Ayman Al-Zawahiri was also a planner and conspirator of 9-11 as well, yet the FBI has stated that he is not wanted in connection with that crime. They have no evidence. But we are told again and again that both of these international video stars are being searched for everyday.
Ask yourself this, how is it that the Pentagon went into Iraq and located and killed Saddam Hussein’s sons four months after invading, then in another five months pulled Saddam out of a hole in the ground, and this while Saddam was circulating stories of his death. Bin Laden and Ayman Al-Zawahiri have supposedly been the stars of dozens of videos broadcast around the world for the last eight years.
Oh, they are in Pakistan you say, this is different. Well what of Mir Aimal Kansi? What, you have never heard of Mir Aimal Kansi? Well, his real surname is spelled “Kasi”, does that help you? No.
Mir Aimal Kansi on the morning of January 25, 1993 opened fire with an AK-47 on CIA employees as they drove up to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Mir Aimal Kansi killed two CIA employees, wounded two others, and also wounded a telephone company worker on his way inside to perform some work.
Shortly thereafter on February 9, 1993 Mir Aimal Kansi was added to the FBI’s Most Wanted list. Mir Aimal Kansi was already in Pakistan, and he was living in the border area with Afghanistan, the so-called “tribal areas” that we are told are impossible for us to penetrate and operate in. Well, it took a bit over four years, but the FBI arrested Mir Aimal Kansi in those tribal areas of Pakistan, actually just over the border in Afghanistan.
They did not take Mir Aimal Kansi to Guantanamo either, nor was he declared an “enemy combatant”. Mir Aimal Kansi was not even charged with a Federal crime! He was turned over to state police officials in Virginia, where he was charged with two counts of murder, convicted quickly, sentenced to death on January 23, 1998 and contrary to what we are told about death penalty appeals always taking twenty years, Mir Aimal Kansi was executed by lethal injection on November 14, 2002. Far from twenty years on death row, Mir Aimal Kansi did not even last four years there.
Perhaps this is why you do not know who Mir Aimal Kansi is? The facts of his case, step by step, stand in direct opposition to the ridiculous and outrageous pack of lies that have been rammed down our throats for the past eight plus years.
Are you beginning to see how the “news” media act as a controlled propaganda organ in this country, not unlike CCTV in Beijing, China?
Mir Aimal Kansi still has more lessons to teach us.
In a series of ten letters to Salon reporter Jeff Stein in 1998, Mir Aimal Kansi stated that he wanted to kill the then Director of the CIA, James Woolsey. Failing that he wanted to kill the then former Director of the CIA Robert Gates (currently the Secretary of Defense). Why did Mir Aimal Kansi wish to kill these two men? Because “these are people who make up policies for CIA or U.S. Government.”
That makes perfect sense. You and I and our neighbors do not have anything to do with the polices of this government. The media tell us several times a day that this is a democracy, but we have no input whatsoever into what the policies of this government are. We are not even told where these policies are formulated and by who. Government agencies, “think tanks”, Universities, Fortune 500 corporate boardrooms, bankers, Wall Street investment houses, probably some combination of all of these, though we do not know how they work it out. However it is done we are told after they are finished what the policy is, then the Republicans and Democrats debate the best method to implement those policies.
The actual formulation of the policy though remains a mystery. What is left for “debate” is not even worthy of our attention.
To the very end as he awaited the death sentence to be carried out Mir Aimal Kansi insisted that “I am not against the USA or the American people. I am against the policies of the U.S. government toward Islamic countries or toward Muslims.”
Now let us consider those who we are told were the perpetrators of 9-11. Ayman Al-Zawahiri -who was likely dead before 9-11 went off- was an Egyptian medical doctor from a wealthy, intelligent, well educated family. Mohamed Atta was also an Egyptian from a wealthy well educated family, and he received degrees from German Universities in engineering. These very smart people studied the American government for many years, in the case of Ayman Al-Zawahiri, he studied America for over two decades before 9-11.
Why would such people target some tall buildings in lower Manhattan, which were populated mostly by clerks, average Joe Americans who have nothing to do with the formulation of government policies which these people hate?
If these people sat down and analyzed our government what would their likely targets be?
Well, where do most of the government planners come from? The people who populate the CIA, the think tanks, and the corporate board rooms?
They come from our elite Universities. Harvard, Yale, MIT, Princeton, Stanford etc.
Would it not make far more sense to fly planes into these institutions, to drive truck bombs onto their campuses, then to try to blow up skyscrapers full of people who have never set foot on such places and have nothing to do with the formulation of American policies? The hijackers never tried to fly a plane into CIA headquarters!
If for some strange reason the attackers did not think it was a good idea to take out the current and future brains of the American Empire located at our elite Universities then why would they not target the arms manufacturers who produce the advanced military components used to kill their people? Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin (Hellfire missiles), General Atomics (Predator drones), and United Technologies Corporation (Blackhawk helicopters).
Anyone can find out who the executives and members of the Board of Directors of these arms manufacturers are. You can find out who they are, and you can find out where they live. People like Ayman Al-Zawahiri and Mohamed Atta were smarter and better educated, and far more determined than ninety-five percent of the private detectives in this country, and there is not one private detective who could not find out all the necessary information on who runs Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and the rest and where they live.
In our lifetime there is only one terrorist who has entered this country and committed terrorist acts, Mir Aimal Kansi. And his actions, his capture, his fate and his words justifying his actions remain unknown to almost the entire American population. There is only one reason for that. The American “news” media is a propaganda weapon of the CIA, and the friends of the CIA.
Let us examine another important event that was from the beginning misreported, and the lessons of it since buried. This would be the case of the “Beltway Snipers”, John Allen Muhammad, and Lee Boyd Malvo. At the beginning of October 2002 the White House was busy propagandizing the American people for the previously planned invasion of Iraq that would begin five months later. Such an event as invading Iraq calls for a massive and systematic barrage of propaganda.
John Allen Muhammad, and Lee Boyd Malvo knocked the White House war machine off the air. This was totally unexpected. The war machine had no idea what to do. After a week of this they feebly attempted to suggest that the attacks by John Allen Muhammad, and Lee Boyd Malvo were the work of -you guessed it- “Al Qaeda”. However, the “news” media had already invested in the FBI’s erroneous assumptions that the attacks were the work of an “angry white male”, and making the switch to “Al Qaeda” just was not in the cards. So the march to war was put on hold.
Immediately upon resolution of the case with the arrests of John Allen Muhammad, and Lee Boyd Malvo the war machine was back on the air seven days and nights a week. Did John Allen Muhammad, and Lee Boyd Malvo delay the start of the Iraq war? I believe they did. If they could have some how gone on as they were and then escalated their attacks to higher level targets I believe they could have delayed the war for as long as several more months until the war machine could effect a change. I believe the war machine would have actually considered another attack on this country, probably with a “dirty bomb”, the effects of which would have been greatly exaggerated to truly terrify the people and push the “Beltway Snipers” to the back of the news broadcast.
This is the true nature of our enemy. They will do anything to control us. That control means power and wealth. It is the nature of the psychopath to pursue such ends relentlessly and without remorse. Such individuals acting collectively will never stop. They must be stopped by force. If you value the lives of your children and your grandchildren you have no choice but to stop them. They are turning six billion people on this planet into our enemies. If our children survive this certainly our grandchildren will not.
Those who ran Japan and Germany in the 1930’s believed otherwise, that they were invincible and destined to run the world for a thousand years. Look at pictures of Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden. The world we are living in has worse weapons of destruction then were available then, which means a Hiroshima or Dresden outcome for us will be many many times worse.
Where an intelligence agency like the CIA exists, democracy cannot. Only democracy can save America from an end far worse than Dresden or Hiroshima.
UPDATE: May 2, 2011
Is Osama bin Laden’s Death an American Declaration of War with Pakistan?
Did the CIA really murder Osama bin Laden on May 1st 2011? Clearly I do not believe they did, and the announced circumstances mean that no proof will ever be offered. The world is to be told that there is DNA proof, but this is no more than accepting the word of the CIA.
And how stupid would someone have to be in order to accept anything the CIA does or says as the truth?
So let’s move on to something that does matter, the fable of bin Laden’s death.
The story as we now hear it is that bin Laden has not been in a cave for the past ten years hooked up to a dialysis machine. No, now we are told that he has lived in a mansion in the suburbs of Islamabad near a Pakistani military base. We are also told that the Pakistani government did not know about this secret mission to murder bin Laden.
Now what sort of conclusion would anyone with a functioning IQ discern from those “facts”? Well, after a day of Orwellian “two minutes of hate” over and over the fascist TV “news” here in America will begin their accusations of Pakistani military involvement in protecting bin Laden (who of course has been dead since 1998).
And what can the Pakistani government say in response to such an accusation? The truth, that bin Laden was not there? The body is gone and the CIA claims they have DNA proof.
So how are the Pakistani’s to resist the continued bombardment of their nation with Predator drones firing Hellfire missiles (aren’t you glad we are a “Christian nation”)? You can hear the TV “news” accusations already.
“So first we find out they have been hiding bin Laden for ten years and now they refuse to cooperate in getting his army that’s running around their country.”
The accusations will rise to the level of insinuating that the Pakistani military helped plan September 11, 2001. Only insinuating of course. That’s what the New York Times is for, to play referee so things don’t escalate out of control.
And what of Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri? Well, if Pakistan doesn’t want to play along now that they’ve seen what the CIA is willing to do in order to brand them as a “terror state” then the CIA will drop in on them again and claim to have murdered Dr. Ayman Al-Zawahiri in a mansion in the suburbs of another Pakistani city near a different Pakistani military base.
And how do the CIA get away with such a ridiculous tall tale? Through decades of fear and hate spread through the mass media here in America. Whole populations the size of nations within America have been defined as an enemy. The TV “news” manufacturers reasons for state sponsored murder here within America as well as around the world.
America is always good and noble – even though we leave millions of Americans lying on the sidewalks or existing inside tents. Even though we refuse to provide health care for more than fifty million Americans. Even though America has five percent of the world’s people and twenty-five percent of the world’s prisoners.
And why does America have such an extraordinary percentage of its population incarcerated? Is it because America is a nation of criminals?
The CIA’s fascist war machine makes war upon the people outside America through the “War on Terror” and makes war upon people inside America through the “War on Drugs”.
And why Pakistan?
Mir Aimal Kansi.
Mir Aimal Kansi struck a blow against the CIA that no one else has ever done. Mir Aimal Kansi put Pakistan on the CIA’s map. Mir Aimal Kansi took down the world map at CIA headquarters and put up a map of Pakistan in its place.
UPDATE: March 15, 2010
Sharif Mobley is the latest to be labeled a member of the fictitious terrorist group called ‘Al Qaeda”. I challenge you the reader to find any evidence within any article you read that ties this young man -who has never been a criminal but in fact a hard worker liked by his fellow workers and superiors- to the fictitious group called “Al Qaeda”.
You will not, because you cannot. You cannot find gold by melting pennies since the pennies are made of copper. And you cannot find any evidence that Sharif Mobley is a member of a group called ‘Al Qaeda” because Al Qaeda does not exist.
Islam exists. Sharif Mobley went to Yemen to live and study as a Muslim, just as in parts of Pennsylvania you have pious Christians living off the land and driving horse drawn buggies down the road. Modern society -especially American society- does not agree with many people, and unable to change it, they drop out as “hippies” in the 1960’s did.
It is disgusting to read this fascist bullshit in “newspapers” that paints this man Sharif Mobley as a demon when his whole life lived here in America was just the opposite. And the only thing offered as ‘evidence” is the so-called “journalists” claim that “authorities in Yemen say…”.
So Sharif Mobley works hard, commits no crimes in America. He goes to Yemen to live as a Muslim and we are to take the word of some “journalist” who claims that “authorities in Yemen say”.
Who are these unnamed “authorities? The same kind of authorities who in Afghanistan turned over to the CIA hundreds of innocent people in Afghanistan who those authorities did not like for other reasons, and labeled them “terrorists”. Then the CIA tortured them.
Where is the evidence that “Al Qaeda” exists? Is there anyone with a functioning three digit IQ who thinks Osama Bin Laden is alive in Pakistan making videos that sound like they were authored by Oliver North?
Saddam Hussein was pulled from a hole in nine months by US military forces in Iraq. It’s going on nine years since September 11th 2001 and there is no longer any mention of capturing anyone named Osama Bin laden or the Egyptian doctor Ayman Al-Zawahiri. The FBI does not even list these two reported -and reported, and reported and reported- “Al Qaeda masterminds” as having anything to do with the 9-11-2001 attacks. If you don’t believe me then go read the FBI’s Web site. Yet the “news” media have always reported otherwise and never retracted any of it. The same “news” media that tell us that Sharif Mobley is a member of this fictitious terrorist group.
Has Sharif Mobley ever been arrested with a gun? Ever been found with a bomb or explosives? NO! He has only been found at work, doing the jobs he was hired to do and getting along with all his fellow workers and his superiors.
But the Military Industrial Complex, the Intelligence Industrial Complex and the Prison Industrial Complex cannot make money off Sharif Mobley being a good citizen here, or a devote Muslim in Yemen. But all three complexes of evil can make a lot of money off Sharif Mobley if he is labeled as a member of the fictitious terrorist group known as ‘Al Qaeda’.
Al Qaeda does not exist.
Sharif Mobley the good hard working citizen does exist. And the Complex of Evil is going to destroy him for profit.
Colleen R. LaRose is a name you are probably not familiar with, and likely never will be. However, you have heard of “Jihad Jane”, and will be hearing of her again and again, though you will find out very little about her. The reason you will find out very little is that she is not a terrorist. Colleen R. LaRose has never met anyone from a terrorist group, never owned a gun, never possessed explosives.
Colleen R. LaRose has never met the Swedish artist -Lars Vilks– who she is supposed to have been plotting to kill. Yet she is today facing charges which will land her in Federal prison for the rest of her life.
Furthermore, it has been revealed that her attorney is Federal Public Defender Mark T. Wilson, who is known to work hand-in-glove with US Attorney Michael Levy of Philadelphia. This means that none of the fraudulent “evidence” assembled by the FBI and Michael Levy will ever be challenged. The jury will hear lie on top of lie, and having been told nothing but lies about Colleen R. LaRose they will convict her on all counts.
The “news” media in America will then report her conviction as some sort of validation of the charges assembled against her, which have no merit.
Colleen R. LaRose is guilty of nothing more than living a fantasy life online, and then taking a trip to Europe, where she apparently snapped back into reality before returning home.
But not so fast! The FBI and Zionist groups had been tracking her according to the New York Times (though the Times does not reveal those groups to be Zionists, we can figure this out for ourselves). They are not about to allow her to get out of their grip and go back to her life in Pennsylvania where she was an upstanding citizen. Both her live in male companion of five years and a previous husband have spoken up for her character.
No sir, Colleen R. LaRose having been under surveillance by the Complex of Evil and made a target will not be allowed to slip through their grasp. She is worth at least $35,000 a year to the Prison Industrial Complex after her bogus show trial is completed. Colleen R. LaRose is considered Federal property now.
And her appointed attorney Mark T. Wilson will make sure she becomes Federal property for as long as she lives.
Update: March 30, 2011
Mark T. Wilson, alleged defense attorney, also alleged to be working for the Federal Public Defenders Office in Philadelphia, succeeded in talking Colleen R LaRose into pleading guilty to every charge!
Was this a capital case? What kind of “defense” attorney would have his client plead guilty to every charge leveled against her? Well, Mark T. Wilson is a special kind of defense attorney. Mark T. Wilson takes every political case in the Philadelphia Federal Public Defenders Office. If the FBI does not like you for political reasons and you’re charged with some kind of offense by the FBI in Philadelphia, then Mark T. Wilson will be your appointed attorney, and Mark T. Wilson will see to it that you go down in flames no matter how outrageous the charges against you are. No matter how innocent you are, Mark T. Wilson will do his duty as a plant in the Federal Defenders Office and see to it that you go down in flames.
Mark T. Wilson is also listed on the wiki for Guantanamo Bay attorneys. He is one of the attorneys for whom no client is listed. That is not good. Mark T. Wilson may well be in use for multiple attorneys and gathering confidential information for the FBI and CIA, both against those imprisoned in Guantanamo and against the attorneys representing them.
What is it that sustains such madness as this?
Propaganda. Well constructed and well disseminated propaganda.
Case in point: Steve Coll.
Steve Coll is ostensibly a “journalist” for The New Yorker magazine. The New Yorker is an important publication, let us be clear about that. It is an intellectual publication widely read by University professors, other journalists, politicians, media creators including Hollywood writers, and members of the permanent government in Washington.
I have to be candid about my feelings on Steve Coll. I frankly find his writings to be psychotic. Not in the way that is easily recognized by the general public. If that were the case he would not be writing for the New Yorker. No, to recognize Steve Coll takes a great amount of learned depth in what Steve Coll is doing as much as what Steve Coll is writing about.
To recognize him it is instructive to be familiar with the practices of the CIA during the “Cold War” with the Soviet Union. The CIA went as far as funding publications such as National Review (always favorably spoken of by the New Yorker, or at least its founder William F. Buckley-CIA asset, and father of sometimes New Yorker writer Christopher Buckley). The CIA also had many “journalists” on their payroll.
And they still do.
In the March 1st 2010 issue of The New Yorker, Steve Coll rambles on about all things Pakistan and Taliban (oddly only one mention of the fictional “Al Qaeda”). If you feel dizzy after perusing a few paragraphs you need not worry, it’s not you, it’s Steve Coll.
Midway through his rambling mess Steve Coll mentions one of his favorite subjects: paranoia. Steve Coll says that politics in Pakistan has a “paranoid style” that “makes the American version look quaint”.
Do you think politics in America has a “paranoid style”? I would characterize the American Style as apathetic. When was the last time you saw a political demonstration? Better question: when was the last time you saw a TV “reporter” talk to a political demonstrator? For most of you the answer to that is “never”.
Welcome to America, where the “press” claims to be “free”, but only talks to the police and their superiors. You and I? Well, we’re all “paranoid” and according to Steve Coll we’ve got “style” too!
Steve Coll does mention someone in this piece who actually exists (different from his nonsense about ‘Al Qaeda”), Abdul Salam Zaeef, Taliban big turban and former Guantanamo prisoner. His book “My Life with the Taliban” is apparently available to read and if you would like to know about his captivity down on Castro’s island -we pay Fidel something like $4,000- a year rent (how’s that for subsidized rent?!)-you’ll have to find a copy because Steve Coll has no interest in that subject, he instead craftily leads the reader to think that Guantanamo has been closed down by Obama (news to the prisoners still being tortured and killed there). The rest of the piece is just Kissinger like ramblings designed to make you believe that everything is too complicated for you to be involved, so let Steve Coll and his unnamed friends and sponsors (CIA) worry about it.
But Steve Coll’s latest is rather pallid and languid by his standards. Let’s look at Steve Coll’s New Yorker post on January 18th 2010.
This was ostensibly about the Nigerian “underwear bomber”, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who Steve Coll mentions only once by name, and never mentions his country of origin, in contrast to the fictional terrorist organization known as “Al Qaeda”, which Steve Coll mentions at least nine times in a “Talk of the Town” comment.
Not mentioning Nigeria is far from the smallest of sins. Steve Coll also never mentions that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was diagnosed as mentally ill years before and his father had alerted the authorities of possible trouble from him for that reason. Steve Coll is not interested in mentioning Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s mental illness because that would blow up the notion of him being a member of that notorious fictional terrorist group who Steve Coll acts as a publicist for. It will be interesting to see if Steve Coll writes anything about “Jihad Jane” who has also struggled with depression and possible bi-polar mental issues in the past, something the FBI, CIA and Steve Coll are not interested in.
What is most interesting though is the fact that not one small piece of evidence can be unearthed to tie Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab,“Jihad Jane” or Sharif Mobley to any terrorist group, and certainly not Steve Coll’s favorite group, since Al Qaeda does not exist.
Later in the “Talk of the Town” comment, Steve Coll not only mentions Dick Cheney, he quotes him in full as Cheney attacks Obama. Then Steve Coll quotes Obama so as to etch in stone Obama signing on to Dick Cheney’s “War on Terror”. So Steve Coll craftily moves Obama to the right, toward Dick Cheney, Israel, the CIA and Pentagon.
That is Steve Coll’s mission at The New Yorker.
Everything ever said about the fictional terrorist group Al Qaeda is distilled as truth. No sources for anything about Al Qaeda are ever provided. No one accused of belonging to Al Qaeda is ever tied to the group through evidence, since Al Qaeda does not exist. So Steve Coll just writes about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as if it is a scientific fact that he is a member of this group. An unquestionable fact on the order of the sun rising in the east every morning and setting in the west every evening.
And if you question Steve Coll on the factuality of his assertion? Then you’re paranoid!
When you are Steve Coll footnotes are not necessary.
“Al Qaeda shifts shapes and seizes opportunities, characteristics that argue for its longevity. It will be able to wreak havoc periodically for as long as it can recruit suicide bombers and well-educated talent, as it has done consistently.”
Huh? Has Steve Coll been playing video games while on LSD? You can check every “comment” made by Steve Coll in the New Yorker regarding this fictional terror group and never find anything resembling a piece of evidence that they exist as an entity. That is because Al Qaeda does not exist. No one that Steve Coll writes about has ever been in contact with any of the international TV superstars who have been at large as Steve Coll says in this article “hunkered down, presumably along the Afghan-Pakistani border, surrounded by only about two hundred hard-core followers.”
Well, Mr. Coll if this is known then why haven’t Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri been arrested or killed? Obama has given the OK to launch Hellfire missiles from Predator drones that have killed over six hundred Pakistanis, yet Steve Coll claims that Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are “hunkered down” and “surrounded by…two hundred hard-core followers”. Unless these two international TV superstars and their 200 followers are more efficient at self compaction than circus clowns in a Volkswagen, that is a target many times larger than necessary to be destroyed by Hellfire missiles launched from Predator drones.
But Steve Coll does not even raise this point anywhere in his writing. He does mention something that jumps off the page though:
“Unlike Hezbollah, Al Qaeda provides no social services and thus has built no political movement.”
That is due to the fact that Hezbollah exists, while Al Qaeda does not exist. Hamas exists, Al Qaeda does not exist. The Egyptian Brotherhood -which Ayman al-Zawahiri was once a member of- exists, while Al Qaeda does not exist. I have seen video over twenty years old of Ayman al-Zawahiri in a prison cell in Egypt, with many fellow prisoners, chanting slogans of defiance against the Egyptian authorities. The Taliban exists, Al Qaeda does not exist.
The evidence for the existence of Hezbollah, Hamas, Egyptian Brotherhood and the Taliban is voluminous, in this country and all countries in the Western and literate non-Western world.
There is nothing but sourceless CIA generated propaganda to suggest that some entity called Al Qaeda exists, yet Steve Coll and others of his ilk continue to defiantly insist that they are a real live menace of such proportion that we must give up our rights as human beings in order to survive the lethal onslaught of the “Shoe Bomber”, the “Underwear Bomber” and some bi-polar mental patient from the Philadelphia suburbs known as “Jihad Jane”.
Why not just tell us that The Riddler, The Penguin and The Joker are going to kill us under the orders of “Al Qaeda”? It is no less silly.
Time for Commissioner Gordon to pick up the red phone and call Batman. Maybe he can find and apprehend Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. I just hope Batman’s Bat Shield can protect him from shoe-bombs, underwear-bombs and youtube videos made by bi-polar women off their meds. It’s tough being a superhero these days.
UPDATE: March 27, 2010
Well, it’s been almost three weeks since the big “Jihad Jane” story broke. At that time Colleen R. LaRose was demonized nationally and in particular throughout the Philadelphia area, poisoning the jury pool. And that is important since it appears from the articles that she will have to face trial as the Feds have charged her with everything they could think of. The penalty at a minimum will be 50 years longer than Colleen R. LaRose has left to live.
So what was the response to this poisoning of the jury pool by her attorney, Federal Public Defender Mark T. Wilson?
Nothing. He had no comment.
I don’t understand Mr. Mark T. Wilson. Your client has just been demonized as a traitor and terrorist, based upon evidence that shows she played around on youtube and Web forums, and then took an uneventful trip to Europe. I was not aware that playing on the Internet and taking a peaceful trip to Europe as a tourist defined someone as evil.
What did I miss Mark T. Wilson? Was it your secret friendly relationship with Michael Levy? Was it Mark T. Wilson’s work as an undercover operative of the FBI inside the Federal Public Defenders office? Or is the whole Federal Public Defenders office corrupt in this manner?
Does the Federal Public Defenders office only act on behalf of sleazebag criminals while sitting down and doing nothing for anyone accused of not being a RepubliCrat pimp, whore or pedophile?
Why is it that the Federal Public Defenders office will go to bat for pedophiles, but not morally upright individuals who refuse to salute the Israeli flag, who refuse to support the mass murder of civilians by the Pentagon around the world, or who will not pretend that they cannot see the legions of homeless Americans left on the sidewalk?
Obviously the entire Public Defenders Office should have called a press conference, standing on a stage like the Justice Department does in Washington, and then took turns defending Colleen R. LaRose against these ridiculous charges that will eliminate her life.
And make no mistake about it, a death sentence is better than “life” inside the American Prison Industrial Complex. If you are facing even a potential 20 years then you are better off dead. Take the bullet, and take as many of them as you can with you.
If I were looking at ten years I would take as many of them with me as I could.
Mark T. Wilson and his Federal Public Defenders office are pure evil.
UPDATE: March 29, 2010
OBAMA IS A JEW
I was stunned to read a recent piece in the Talk of The Town section of the New Yorker, by the editor of the magazine David Remnick. Therein Mr. Remnick did not say Obama was a Jew, he defined Obama as a Jew.
It may be that Joe Biden too is a Jew. David Remnick describes Biden as “an ardent Zionist”. How could anyone be an “ardent Zionist” and not be a Jew? The only other answer would be that Biden is a psychopath on the order of Hannibal Lecter. Certainly the ethnic cleansing behavior and track record of murderous deceit that Zionism is would appeal to such a monster.
But no matter. Let us turn to David Remnick’s definition of Obama. He begins by pointing out that David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel are both Jews, going so far as to point out that during the first Gulf War Rahm Emanuel was not even in this country, he was serving in the Israeli army! David Remnick should also have pointed out that Rahm Emanuel’s father was a bomb throwing Zionist terrorist as well, but truth has it’s limits with liberals like David Remnick.
Then it is interesting to note the recounting of Obama’s first big political foray into Chicago politics when he opposed former Black Panther Bobby Rush with the backing of Jewish money and advice. Strange how easily black Americans have been hypnotized by Obama.
Then it is best to quote David Remnick:
“As a rising politician with Ivy League connections, Obama had financial backing from all over, including from a class of young black entrepreneurs. But he has had Jewish mentors throughout his career. Philanthropists like Bettylu Saltzman, Penny Pritzker, and Lester Crown were crucial to his campaigns. His friend and neighbor the late Arnold Jacob Wolf was a rabbi. Michelle Obama’s cousin Capers C. Funnye, Jr., is the first African-American member of the Chicago Board of Rabbis and the spiritual leader of Beth Shalom, a congregation on the South Side. One of Obama’s closest colleagues in Springfield was Ira Silverstein, an Orthodox Jew, with whom he shared an office suite in the Capitol building; Obama acted as Silverstein’s shabbos goy, turning on lights and pushing elevator buttons for him on Saturdays.”
It is worth focusing on Michelle Obama’s cousin as well. Most Americans are unaware of the large number of American Jews who are black. On TV every Jew we ever see is white, but in fact there are at least a quarter of a million Jews in America who are black. If Michelle Obama’s cousin is a Jew are we to really not wonder whether she too is a Jew? Is this Jewish connection the reason for her financial success, and indeed is the Obama couple a Jewish couple?
David Remnick continues to inform us:
“One of his mentors in Chicago, Abner Mikva, a former congressman, federal judge, and counsel to Bill Clinton, jokingly told the Chicago Jewish News during the campaign, ‘I think when this is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president.’”
Somehow I doubt this is going to be said much on CNN, Fox News or by that darling princess Katie Couric.
The white liberal differs from the white conservative only in one way: the liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative.
Both want power, but the white liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro’s friend and benefactor; and by winning the friendship, allegiance, and support of the Negro, the white liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or tool in this political “football game” that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.
The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox. – Malcolm X